The gap between 3 guest uses and 8 free logged-in uses is not only a number gap. The bigger question is whether you need more count or more continuity.
If you only want to test the chart entry and the first question flow, guest use is often enough. If you expect follow-up and review, logged-in use matters more.
Separate the layers first
Count is the surface difference. Continuity is the deeper difference.
The current public boundary is still 3 guest uses a day and 8 free logged-in uses a day.
Questions like "What Is the Real Difference Between 3 Guest AI Fortune-Telling Uses and 8 Free Logged-In Uses" are really about what each layer solves for you, not about price alone.
Look at a real usage case
A guest session can already test one old event and one live question.
A longer decision, such as a job move, benefits more from continuity than from one extra line of advice.
The steadier order is still to use the basic layer for one real verification round, then judge whether continuity and quota actually matter for you.
Cheap is not the same as worth it
Logged-in free use does not automatically mean better quality.
Guest use still has value when your goal is first-pass screening.
So do not isolate the public price or the daily quota from the service shape behind them. The real value test is whether you will use that continuity.
A steadier spending order
- Decide whether today is only a trial or the start of a series.
- Use guest quota on the most testable question first.
- Move to logged-in free use only when continuity matters.