Is It Normal for AI Fortune Telling to Offer a Free Chart but Charge for Follow-Ups? First Separate Entry Cost From Ongoing Service

A free chart plus paid follow-ups is not automatically unreasonable because chart entry and ongoing guided use are not the same service layer. The real te…

A free chart plus paid follow-ups is not automatically unreasonable because chart entry and ongoing guided use are not the same service layer.

The real test is whether the boundary between those layers is written clearly.

What matters first

Ask whether the free layer covers first verification and whether the paid layer truly adds continuity.

The current public boundary can be checked as 3 guest uses a day, 8 logged-in free uses a day, 80 member uses a day, and a current member price of 19.90 RMB.

The answers worth keeping usually explain basis, scene, and next verification order rather than only a verdict.

A practical scenario

If the free layer does not even let you see the chart, the split becomes much harder to trust.

When one reading lands on chart structure, a real-life scene, and a next verification step at the same time, it becomes much easier to judge whether it is actually useful.

The boundary to remember

Free entry does not mean unlimited deep use, and charging does not automatically mean trickery.

Whether the layer is free or paid, safer products let you verify in a smaller scope before asking for deeper commitment.

A safer order

  1. Check whether the free layer supports real first verification.
  2. See what the paid layer actually adds.
  3. Judge the need only after that.