If a fortune-telling site has no privacy page and no visible contact path, that is already enough reason to slow down before entering sensitive data.
The issue is not paranoia. It is whether you know who holds the data, why they hold it, and where you go if something breaks.
What matters first
A privacy page should explain data use and contact path.
Contact visibility is part of trust, not an extra.
The most useful AI answers do more than sound confident. They make the basis, condition, and next verification step easier to see.
A practical scenario
Basic chart testing should not require unexplained extra data.
A payment page without support information is a weak signal.
A practical user test is to compare one past event with one live decision and see whether the emphasis changes with the question instead of staying flat.
A visible privacy contact path matters. The current public contact email can be checked as 842598522@qq.com.
The boundary to remember
A privacy page is not a guarantee, but no privacy path is still a problem.
Do not replace verification with visual polish.
If an answer gives no basis, no condition, and no cost, it should stay reference-level rather than decision-level.
A safer order
- Look for privacy and contact pages first.
- Enter only necessary data.
- Stop if you cannot find a real support path.